Archive

Monthly Archives: January 2009

I keep hearing complaints that Apple’s restrictions on the App Store are too much – that Apple has not created a truly open marketplace.

As recently as last week, I heard a local iPhone developer here in Denver say, “Their restrictive SDK makes it harder to develop and their approval process requires developers to jump through way too many hoops”

He is right – and so what? Who really suffers in the end? Although Apple does not always get it right, they tend to think about the end user over the developer. A more restrictive platform creates obstacles for a reason. If the platform is totally open, developers will find it much easier to create applications that crash the phone, take up all the resources, forgo security best practices, or simply write software that malicious.

A great example of an open platform that developers love is Andriod. It is very open, and developer centric … and that also means it is easier to do very bad things. Case in point, recently Geek.com published a story on an Android App that was adding adware and destroying the memory on their G1 phone…

…[MemoryUp] destroyed my memory card/system delete. Then my email was spammed. TMobile can’t stop you from downloading this! So don’t!” In fact, many note that their SD cards were wiped totally clean.

The only way consumers of the open platforms can be sure the application is safe is to wait for the community to self police (in other words, wait for someone else to find out there’s an issue with the app and then complain about it) — in contrast, Apple reviews every single application submitted to help weed out the really bad ones (although I’ll admit, holding out for months on “Pull My Finger” was a bad move)

As developers, we may want to take a pause and contemplate if a more restrictive platform is actually better for the people we are developing for – even if we have to design and code with one hand tied behind our back…


Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions is a brilliant book – a must read for anyone trying to understand people’s decision making processes.

The book outline written by Bill Odom sold me (thanks for the referral sean) … a little excerpt:

The Power of Price
Why a 50-Cent Aspirin Can Do What A Penny Aspirin Can’t
The placebo effect is well-known and real. It’s not just a matter of fooling oneself; placebos can actually trigger endorphins and opiates and other biological reactions that actually change body and experience. What is interesting, however, is that price has an impact on efficacy.
Ariely, Waber, Shiv, and Carmon made up a fake painkiller, Veladone-Rx. An attractive woman in a business suit (with a faint Russian accent) told subjects that 92% of patients receiving VR reported significant pain relief in 10 minutes, with relief lasting up to 8 hours.

  • When told that the drug cost $2.50 per dose, nearly all of the subjects reported pain relief.
  • When told that the drug cost $0.10 per dose, only half of the subjects reported pain relief.
  • The more pain a person experienced, the more pronounced the effect.
  • A similar study at U Iowa showed that students who paid list price for cold medications reported better medical outcomes than those who bought discount (but clinically identical) drugs.
  • A further study on SoBe Adrenalin Rush showed that students at the gym reported less fatigue when told that the drink was more expensive.
    • And this wasn’t just self-perception. Ariely gave the subjects a 15-question puzzle as well.
      • The control group that didn’t drink SoBe got 9/15 correct
      • The “expensive” group got 9/15 correct
      • The “discount” group got 6.5/15 correct
    • One more variation: Ariely printed “Drinks such as SoBe have been shown to improve mental functioning” on the cover of the quiz booklet, and referred to 50 scientific studies showing its efficacy.
      • The “discount” group improved their score by 0.6
      • The “expensive” group improved their score by 3.3…in other words, they did better than the control group!
    • The effect declined when subjects were asked to stop and reflect on the relationship between price and quality. They were far less likely to assume that discounted drinks were less effective.

Amazon Link


Fun idea from Microsoft – but the viral video is so bad that everyone here thought this was a prank:

Do a little digging though and you find out its the real thing:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/395195_msftsong08.html


I know that some agencies actually work hard at making things so bad that its good – and that, in this case, it is helping spread the word about the product. But I’ve never been one to subscribe to the belief that : “any press is good press”. This is actually a cool & innovative idea that is going to be made fun of because if how it is currently being marketed, and, IMHO it will diminish it value in the eyes of the end users


Short Plug:

Juan Sanchez just turned me on to a Mac utility, Blogo. It allows me to easily post to various blogs and to update Twitter – It’s a little expensive ($25), so not for the blogger on a budget, but I find it much faster to write using this app than using the “rich” editor in wordpress (and it allows you to drag and drop images from your desktop right into the post)

There’s support for WordPress, Blogger, Typepad, Typo, Drupal, Expression Engine, Twitter, Ping.fm etc… There’s also a “Microblog” viewer that allows me to follow Twitter (I find that it launches MUCH faster than Twitterific)

I’ve written this post (and my last 2) using it – there are a few bugs with the editor, but its really a pretty handy tool – Thanks Juan!


Everyone is making their predictions for 2009, so I thought I’d make mine for fun…

“Web 2.0″ will lose traction – thank goodness! :
Executives and investors are tiring of “web 2.0” marketing initiatives and business models (please, nobody try to describe “web 3.0″!). Web 2.0 is a buzz-word that everyone struggles to define – Chris Bernard did the best job when I asked him to describe what it meant to him:

Basically, Web 1.0 is bad Photoshop and web 2.0 is good Photoshop ..

For the last 3 years, everything that was “new” was called “Web 2.0″ – When the term that is used to describe something new… is several years old… guess what happens to the term.

Mobile, duh! :
I think it is obvious that the “next generation” mobile computing platform is upon us. Large platform providers like Apple, Palm, Intel, RIM and Microsoft are all focusing on more sophisticated platforms for mobile development and this will aid in the proliferation of very interesting software and hardware. Therefore, in 2009, we will see an even broader shift to mobile computing. An interesting trend in this market is emerging as families are tightening their belts – they are looking beyond desktop and laptop purchases and opting instead for lower priced iPhones. Additionally, software for mobile devices is much less expensive. Ironically, the “high-end” smart phone market is also turning into the low-end computing market.

Cloud Computing :
A few companies that you may have hear of like Amazon, Salesforce, Microsoft, and Google have all decided that enterprises will no longer want to maintain their own infrastructures. These cloud computing providers are betting huge capitol into the notion that companies will want to power their digital business on someone else’s servers. What is awesome about the power of cloud computing is nearly infinite scalability. This low cost computing power will als help power the next trend .. Small Business SaaS…

Small Business SaaS :
Look for the new breed of SaaS models to take over the web. Cloud computing is enabling nimble and innovative companies to create very compelling and low cost online software services. Larger enterprises like Adobe (acrobat.com) and Microsoft (officelive.com) have been heavily investing in this market. However, we are seeing much smaller companies innovating in this area as well (sliderocket.com, aviary.com, zoho.com, basecamphq.com). The most exciting trend for us is work we are involved in with Web-To-Print. With Adobe’s proliferation of PDF workflows, combined with momentous gains made in browser based technologies — companies like FedEx/Kinkos, Staples, and Office Max will provide new and interesting options for small businesses. These new services will bring the power of traditional desktop publishing, combined with the economies of scale of large retail printing facilities, to provide low-cost, high quality printed materials.


A Focus on the Digital Customer Experience :

Larger enterprises are having to focus their digital business across multiple channels (mobile, desktop, set-top, kiosk, browser, etc.) – which provide them with two major competitive advantages.

The first advantage: brand. If you look at the top 10 iPhone App Store applications, nine of them are known brands. As long as these brands continue to offer good products, their brand trust will elevate their services above others. The second advantage: resources. In 2009, look for enterprises to shift their resources to create consistent, engaging and useful software. Especially now, in a more challenging economic market, digital channels are a very cost effective way to do business. These enterprises are realizing that the way to differentiate will be through providing their customers great utility, usability, efficiency and engagement.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 775 other followers

%d bloggers like this: